In light of the latest UK budget funding announcement, schools and hospitals across the country are set to benefit from new opportunities for refurbishment and maintenance improvements. In this article, Darren Evans, AEC’s Technical Director, explores the vital role these projects play in fostering a culture of safety in education and healthcare environments. With increased investment on the horizon, Darren provides says it is crucial for these establishments to prioritise asbestos safety measures when they plan their building improvement projects.
The recent UK budget announcement has generated excitement in the education sector by allocating significant funds for school refurbishment and building works. The figures published are £1.4billion for the school rebuilding programme, and also a £2billion investment into schools’ maintenance.
This financial boost is poised to address longstanding issues related to aging infrastructure and inadequate facilities in schools. Which one would think includes asbestos. But does it? There is no specific allocation or mention of asbestos in this budget. The Department for Education allocates funds based upon a ‘condition data collection’ survey. This does ask if there is asbestos in the school, in that they ask about compliance with Regulations 4, so is there a survey, and an asbestos management plan (AMP). But the document explicitly states that there will be no review of the content of the AMP. Therefore, this document does not take into account the condition of the asbestos, nor the asbestos products, and therefore there is no allocation of funding based upon risk.
This is in a sector where asbestos related deaths are increasing. Where once the ONS considered education to be a ‘low risk’ occupation, this has now changed, with a fivefold increase in asbestos-related deaths in this sector between 2011 and 2021. In addition ONS figures by sector do not include the over 75s, and only consider the last job. Furthermore, it is only teaching professions rather than school administrators or maintenance staff. Therefore, some studies put teachers at an increased risk factor of up to 4 times that of other professions, and comparing the ONS annual death rate for teachers of 23 compared to claims made to the Department for Work and Pensions at 70 deaths per annum. One thing we do know: Teachers, like nurses in the NHS which has similar figures, did not install asbestos in a previous life, nor did they work on it. They are exposed at work, in schools, which contain deteriorating asbestos materials.
Therefore, as schools plan their refurbishment projects, it’s crucial they prioritise safety measures, particularly through comprehensive asbestos surveys. If a school contains asbestos, any maintenance or refurbishment project must include asbestos in the plans.
Further to this, the Government discussed ‘fixing the NHS’. A huge undertaking! This included ‘with over £1billion to tackle dangerous reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) and make inroads into the existing backlog of critical maintenance, repairs and upgrades across the NHS estate – protecting staff and patients and boosting NHS productivity.’ When one considers that the estimated NHS maintenance backlog is £11billion, this figure is unlikely to make a real dent in the problem.
The government’s commitment to investing billions in school infrastructure is a much-needed response to years of underfunding. Many schools face urgent challenges, including crumbling buildings and outdated facilities that hinder the learning experience. With this new funding, some schools will be able to tackle immediate repairs and undertake significant refurbishment projects, ensuring students learn in safe and supportive environments.
While the new funding opens the door to much-needed renovations, schools must also prioritise safety during these projects. All of the above works require planning, and part of this planning must consider asbestos. A key aspect of ensuring a safe environment is conducting thorough asbestos surveys.
Conclusion
The new budget funding announcement in the UK represents a transformative opportunity for schools to enhance their infrastructure and provide better learning environments for students. This is of course extremely welcome!
It was noticeable that during the budget speech the chancellor addressed recent tragedies such as the infected blood and the post office scandals, and funding for the victims. This follows closely on the heels of the Grenfell inquiry. However, it is disappointing that asbestos victims are seldom mentioned, and that asbestos was not a key part of the funding for schools (and hospitals).
However, as schools embark on these important projects, they must prioritise safety by conducting thorough asbestos surveys, or at the very least including asbestos and review of asbestos management plans as part of all work. By ensuring that all refurbishment and building works are carried out safely, schools can protect the health of their students and staff while making necessary improvements. This holistic approach will not only lead to better educational outcomes but also foster a culture of safety and responsibility within the school community.
The Duty Holder is the owner of the non-domestic premises or the person or organisation that has clear responsibility for the maintenance or repair of non-domestic premises.
The Duty Holder is required to manage the risk from asbestos by:
1. Finding out if there is asbestos in the premises, its location and what condition it is in.
2. Keeping an up-to-date record of the location and condition of the ACMs.
3. Assessing the risk from the material
4. Preparing a detailed plan of how the ACMs risks will be managed
5. Taking steps to put the plan in action
6. Reviewing and monitoring your plan
7.Having a system to inform others about the location and condition of ACMs